Skip to main content

Audience Impression Check

Applicable to: All blog posts
Focus: External audience perception and professional targeting
Scoring: 30 points total

Target Audience Identification​

Primary Professional Audiences​

  • Tech Industry Professionals: Software engineers, product managers, technical leaders
  • Startup Founders and Entrepreneurs: Business leaders, startup teams, investors
  • Product and Design Teams: Product managers, designers, UX researchers
  • Engineering Leaders: Engineering managers, technical leads, architects
  • Career Development Seekers: Professionals looking to advance their careers

Secondary Professional Audiences​

  • Academic and Research Community: Researchers, educators, students
  • Consulting and Advisory: Consultants, advisors, industry experts
  • Media and Content Creators: Journalists, bloggers, content creators
  • Recruiters and Talent Acquisition: HR professionals, recruiters, talent scouts
  • Industry Thought Leaders: Influencers, speakers, conference organizers

Professional Impression Assessment​

Technical Credibility​

  • Demonstrates Deep Technical Knowledge: Shows expertise in relevant technical areas
  • Practical Problem-Solving: Presents real-world solutions to technical challenges
  • Industry Awareness: Shows understanding of current industry trends and practices
  • Methodology and Process: Demonstrates systematic approach to problem-solving
  • Innovation and Creativity: Shows ability to think creatively and propose new solutions

Leadership and Management​

  • Strategic Thinking: Demonstrates ability to think strategically about problems
  • Team Collaboration: Shows experience working with and leading teams
  • Decision-Making Process: Demonstrates thoughtful decision-making approach
  • Change Management: Shows ability to navigate and lead organizational change
  • Mentorship and Development: Demonstrates commitment to developing others

Communication and Influence​

  • Clear Communication: Presents complex ideas in accessible ways
  • Persuasive Arguments: Builds compelling cases for recommendations
  • Stakeholder Management: Shows ability to work with diverse stakeholders
  • Presentation Skills: Demonstrates ability to present ideas effectively
  • Written Communication: Shows strong written communication skills
  • Engaging but Truthful: Content is engaging to read while maintaining complete honesty
  • Fun to Read: Writing has personality and energy that makes it enjoyable
  • Tactical and Minimal: Insights are practical and actionable without unnecessary complexity
  • No Audience-Losing Acronyms: Avoids non-common or ambiguous acronyms that could confuse readers
  • Proper Glossary Coverage: Includes glossary or definitions for any technical terms or acronyms used

Audience-Specific Perceptions​

For Tech Industry Professionals​

  • Technical Depth: Does the content show sufficient technical depth for engineers?
  • Practical Applicability: Are the insights immediately applicable to their work?
  • Industry Relevance: Does the content address current industry challenges?
  • Problem-Solving Approach: Does it show systematic approach to technical problems?
  • Innovation Potential: Does it suggest new ways of thinking about problems?

For Startup Founders and Entrepreneurs​

  • Business Impact: Does the content address business-critical challenges?
  • Scalability Considerations: Are the solutions scalable for growing companies?
  • Resource Constraints: Does it acknowledge typical startup resource limitations?
  • Market Understanding: Shows understanding of market dynamics and customer needs?
  • Growth Potential: Does it suggest pathways for business growth?

For Product and Design Teams​

  • User-Centric Thinking: Does the content prioritize user needs and experience?
  • Design Process: Shows understanding of design thinking and process?
  • Cross-Functional Collaboration: Demonstrates ability to work across disciplines?
  • Data-Driven Approach: Shows use of data and metrics in decision-making?
  • Iterative Improvement: Demonstrates commitment to continuous improvement?

For Engineering Leaders​

  • Technical Leadership: Shows ability to lead technical teams and initiatives?
  • Architecture and Design: Demonstrates understanding of system design principles?
  • Team Development: Shows commitment to developing engineering talent?
  • Process Improvement: Demonstrates focus on engineering process optimization?
  • Strategic Technical Planning: Shows ability to plan technical roadmaps?

For Career Development Seekers​

  • Career Progression: Does the content provide insights for career advancement?
  • Skill Development: Shows pathways for developing relevant skills?
  • Industry Knowledge: Provides valuable industry insights and trends?
  • Networking Value: Offers opportunities for professional networking?
  • Mentorship Potential: Shows potential for mentorship and guidance?

Audience Accessibility Assessment​

Technical Language and Acronyms​

  • Common Acronyms Only: Uses only widely recognized acronyms (e.g., API, UI, UX, CEO, CTO)
  • Acronym Definitions: All acronyms are defined on first use or in a glossary
  • No Ambiguous Acronyms: Avoids acronyms that could have multiple meanings
  • Industry-Specific Terms: Technical terms are explained for broader audience
  • Progressive Disclosure: Complex concepts are introduced gradually with context

Glossary and Definition Requirements​

  • Comprehensive Glossary: Includes definitions for all technical terms and acronyms
  • First-Use Definitions: Technical terms are defined when first introduced
  • Contextual Explanations: Terms are explained within the context they're used
  • Cross-Reference Links: Glossary entries link to relevant sections
  • Accessibility Notes: Special considerations for different audience levels

Language Accessibility​

  • Plain Language: Uses clear, straightforward language when possible
  • Jargon Explanation: Technical jargon is explained in simple terms
  • Analogies and Examples: Complex concepts use relatable analogies
  • Visual Aids: Diagrams or examples support text explanations
  • Progressive Complexity: Content builds from simple to complex concepts

External Perception Simulation​

First Impression Assessment​

  • Professional Credibility: Does the content establish immediate professional credibility?
  • Expertise Demonstration: Does it clearly demonstrate relevant expertise?
  • Value Proposition: Is the value to the reader immediately clear?
  • Engagement Potential: Does it create interest in reading more content?
  • Shareability: Would professionals want to share this content with colleagues?
  • Clean and Easy to Derive Insights: Are key insights presented clearly and easy to extract?
  • Easy to Follow Chain of Thought: Is the logical progression of ideas clear and trackable?
  • Consistent Organization: Does the content follow a consistent organizational pattern?
  • No Jargon Barriers: Content avoids technical jargon or acronyms that could alienate readers
  • Accessible Language: Technical concepts are explained in accessible terms

Long-term Professional Impact​

  • Thought Leadership: Does the content position the author as a thought leader?
  • Industry Influence: Could this content influence industry practices or discussions?
  • Career Advancement: Does it support the author's career advancement goals?
  • Professional Network: Could it help expand professional networks?
  • Reputation Building: Does it contribute to building a strong professional reputation?

Audience Engagement Potential​

  • Discussion Generation: Would this content generate professional discussions?
  • Follow-up Interest: Would readers want to learn more about the author's work?
  • Collaboration Opportunities: Could it lead to professional collaboration opportunities?
  • Speaking Opportunities: Could it lead to speaking or presentation opportunities?
  • Consulting Potential: Could it generate consulting or advisory opportunities?

Key Questions​

  1. What professional audience would find this content most valuable?
  2. How does this content position the author professionally?
  3. What impression would industry professionals have after reading this?
  4. Does the content demonstrate the expertise needed for the target audience?
  5. Would professionals want to share this content with their networks?
  6. Is the content engaging but truthful, fun to read, and tactically minimal?
  7. Are insights clean and easy to derive, with an easy-to-follow chain of thought?
  8. Is the organization consistent and logical throughout?
  9. Are there any non-common or ambiguous acronyms that could lose the audience?
  10. Does the content include proper glossary coverage for all technical terms and acronyms?

Combined Process​

This rubric should be used in combination with the content quality evaluation, personality evaluation, and general blog evaluation to ensure comprehensive assessment of both content quality and professional positioning.

Quality Threshold​

  • Ready to Publish: 24+ criteria met (80%+)
  • Needs Minor Revision: 18-23 criteria met (60-79%)
  • Needs Major Revision: Below 18 criteria met ("under 60%")

Audience Targeting Template​

Primary Audience Focus​

  • Identify target audience: Choose 1-2 primary professional audiences
  • Understand their needs: What challenges do they face daily?
  • Address their pain points: How does your content solve their problems?
  • Use their language: Speak in terms they understand and value
  • Provide actionable insights: Give them something they can implement

Professional Positioning​

  • Demonstrate expertise: Show deep knowledge in relevant areas
  • Share unique insights: Offer perspectives they can't get elsewhere
  • Show practical application: Connect theory to real-world implementation
  • Build credibility: Use examples and case studies from your experience
  • Create value: Ensure every piece provides clear professional value

Audience Engagement​

  • Start with their problems: Begin by addressing audience challenges
  • Use relevant examples: Include examples from their industry context
  • Provide next steps: Give clear actions they can take
  • Encourage discussion: End with questions that prompt professional dialogue
  • Build community: Create content that brings professionals together

Professional Impact​

  • Establish thought leadership: Position yourself as someone worth following
  • Generate opportunities: Create content that opens professional doors
  • Build your network: Write content that attracts like-minded professionals
  • Demonstrate value: Show how your insights can benefit their careers
  • Create lasting impression: Ensure they remember and reference your content
  • Be engaging but truthful: Make content fun to read while maintaining complete honesty
  • Be tactical but minimal: Provide practical insights without unnecessary complexity
  • Maintain consistent organization: Use consistent structure that's easy to follow

Audience Accessibility​

  • Avoid audience-losing content: Eliminate non-common or ambiguous acronyms
  • Provide comprehensive glossary: Include definitions for all technical terms and acronyms
  • Use progressive disclosure: Introduce complex concepts gradually with context
  • Explain technical jargon: Define industry-specific terms for broader audience
  • Include contextual examples: Use analogies and examples to clarify complex concepts

AI METADATA - DO NOT REMOVE OR MODIFY​

AI_UPDATE_INSTRUCTIONS:

This rubric should be automatically re-evaluated every time any blog post is updated.

The AI should check each criterion against the current blog post content and update the markdown checkboxes accordingly.

1. SCAN_SOURCES: Read the current content of any blog post in /blog/ directory

2. EVALUATE_CONTENT: Check each criterion against the blog post content

3. UPDATE_CHECKBOXES: Mark criteria as completed [x] or incomplete [ ] based on current content

4. CALCULATE_SCORE: Count completed criteria and update quality threshold status

5. MAINTAIN_FOCUS: Keep evaluation focused on audience perception and professional targeting

6. PRESERVE_STRUCTURE: Maintain the rubric structure while updating checkboxes

CONTENT_STRUCTURE:

- Target Audience Identification: 10 criteria for primary and secondary professional audiences

- Professional Impression Assessment: 15 criteria for technical credibility, leadership, and communication

- Audience-Specific Perceptions: 25 criteria for different professional audience types

- External Perception Simulation: 15 criteria for first impression and long-term impact

- Audience Engagement Potential: 5 criteria for discussion generation and collaboration

EVALUATION_CRITERIA:

- Technical Credibility: Deep knowledge, practical solutions, industry awareness, methodology, innovation

- Leadership and Management: Strategic thinking, team collaboration, decision-making, change management, mentorship

- Communication and Influence: Clear communication, persuasive arguments, stakeholder management, presentation skills

- Audience Targeting: Specific audience needs, pain points, language, actionable insights, professional value

- Professional Impact: Thought leadership, industry influence, career advancement, network building, reputation

CHECKBOX_UPDATE_RULES:

- Mark [x] if criterion is clearly demonstrated in current blog post content

- Mark [ ] if criterion is missing or insufficiently addressed

- Update based on actual content, not assumptions

- Be strict in evaluation - only mark complete if clearly present

SCORE_CALCULATION:

- Count total [x] checkboxes across all criteria

- Apply quality threshold: 24+ for publish-ready, 18-23 for needs revision, "under 18" for major revision

- Update status indicators based on current score

UPDATE_TRIGGERS:

- Blog post content changes

- New content added to any blog post

- Existing content modified or removed

- Blog post structure changes

- Content audience targeting improvements

FORMATTING_RULES:

- Use [x] for completed criteria, [ ] for incomplete

- Maintain consistent checkbox formatting

- Preserve all section headers and structure

- Keep quality threshold calculations accurate

- AVOID MDX-BREAKING CHARACTERS: Do not use < > & characters without quotes

- Quote values containing < > & characters (e.g., "under threshold" instead of less-than-threshold)

- Use "less than" or "under" instead of < symbol

- Use "greater than" or "over" instead of > symbol

- Use "and" instead of & symbol when possible

UPDATE_FREQUENCY: Every time any blog post is modified or this rubric is accessed