🧠 My Approach

I wanted to document my problem solving approach; thus I made this post.

This post outlines my systematic approach to tackling complex challenges, demonstrating how I navigate ambiguity, make thoughtful technical decisions, and create meaningful impact through collaborative problem-solving.

My Core Problem-Solving Framework

Over my career, I've developed a systematic approach that I apply across all projects, from building ML pipelines processing 1.5B+ images to establishing organization-wide success frameworks. Here's how I work:

1. Information Gathering & Context Building

When facing ambiguous situations, I start by systematically gathering information and building context. This isn't just about collecting data—it's about understanding the problem space, stakeholders, and constraints.

Example: When launching the Self-Service Driver Support (SDS) system, I didn't just build a technical solution. I first mapped out the entire driver support ecosystem, identified 12+ engineering teams that needed coordination, and understood the weblab guidance requirements across different organizations. This approach was grounded in my WLBR training and team process establishment habits.

My Process:

• Map all stakeholders and their needs
• Identify information gaps and knowledge dependencies
• Create shared understanding through documentation and alignment
• Establish clear success metrics and measurement frameworks

2. Structured Decision-Making with Tradeoff Analysis

I approach technical decisions through systematic tradeoff analysis, always considering multiple dimensions: performance, maintainability, scalability, and business impact.

Example: For the ML Pipeline Optimization project, I had to choose between GPU-intensive solutions and distributed processing. I evaluated:

• Performance: 536% throughput increase vs. infrastructure complexity
• Cost: GPU costs vs. distributed system maintenance
• Scalability: Future growth requirements vs. current constraints
• Risk: Technical debt vs. immediate delivery pressure

This decision-making process was documented in my CognitiveScale design documents and architecture planning notes.

My Framework:

• Document all options with pros/cons
• Quantify tradeoffs where possible
• Consider long-term implications, not just immediate needs
• Get stakeholder input on non-technical factors
• Make decisions with clear rationale and fallback plans

3. Iterative Problem Decomposition

Complex problems become manageable when broken into smaller, testable components. I use iterative decomposition to tackle large challenges systematically.

Example: The F2-SCX Experimentation Framework wasn't built as one monolithic system. I broke it down into:

• Experiment design and setup processes
• Metrics collection and analysis frameworks
• MacAds integration for context-aware advertising
• Team training and adoption mechanisms

This decomposition approach was refined through my F2-SCX plans and leading metrics workstream documentation.

My Approach:

• Start with the end goal and work backwards
• Identify the smallest viable components
• Build incrementally with continuous validation
• Create feedback loops for rapid iteration
• Document learnings for future similar problems

4. Stakeholder Alignment Through Shared Vision

Technical solutions only succeed when stakeholders are aligned. I focus heavily on creating shared understanding and buy-in across diverse teams.

Example: For the Organization-Wide Success Framework, I didn't just research metrics—I created an L8+ focused document that clearly articulated the value proposition and got skip-level buy-in for organization-wide adoption. This stakeholder alignment approach was developed through my career growth planning and promotion pursuit habits.

My Methodology:

• Tailor communication to each stakeholder group
• Create compelling narratives that connect to their goals
• Use data and examples to build credibility
• Establish regular feedback mechanisms
• Celebrate wins and learn from failures together

5. Working Backwards from Customer Impact

I start every project by working backwards from the desired customer impact, then design the technical solution to achieve that impact. This ensures we're building the right thing, not just building things right.

Example: For the Driver Feedback AI System, I started with the customer problem (75% reduction in driver-related contacts) and worked backwards to design the agentic AI stack with intent routing. This approach was grounded in my working backwards habits and WLBR training.

My Process:

• Define the customer problem and desired outcome
• Work backwards to identify the technical requirements
• Design the solution to directly address the customer need
• Validate assumptions through customer feedback and data
• Iterate based on actual customer impact

6. Metrics-Driven Decision Making

I use data and metrics to drive all decisions, from technical architecture choices to stakeholder alignment strategies. Every decision is backed by measurable evidence.

Example: For the F2-SCX Experimentation Framework, I developed comprehensive metrics analysis including APT metrics deep dives, abandonment calculations, and attribution tracking. This metrics-driven approach was documented in my leading metrics workstream and F2-SCX plans.

My Framework:

• Establish baseline metrics before making changes
• Define success criteria with measurable outcomes
• Track leading and lagging indicators
• Use data to validate assumptions and guide decisions
• Create feedback loops for continuous improvement

7. Innovation Process & Ideation Leadership

I systematically foster innovation through structured ideation processes, hackathon coordination, and team motivation frameworks.

Example: My Team Ideation & Innovation Leadership approach generated 50+ experiment ideas across 7 hackathon sessions, with specific focus on increasing leadership adoption through practical POCs. This innovation process was documented in my innovation process habits and team development notes.

My Methodology:

• Create structured ideation sessions with clear objectives
• Focus on practical, implementable ideas with clear value propositions
• Build POCs that demonstrate concrete value to leadership
• Establish feedback loops between ideation and implementation
• Document and share successful innovation patterns

8. Technical Leadership & Mentorship

I approach technical leadership through systematic mentorship, knowledge sharing, and team development processes.

Example: My WLBR training and standards development created comprehensive experimentation frameworks that were adopted organization-wide. This leadership approach was grounded in my WLBR training notes and working backwards habits.

My Approach:

• Create comprehensive documentation and training materials
• Establish standards and best practices for team adoption
• Mentor team members through hands-on guidance
• Build systems that enable others to succeed independently
• Share knowledge through formal and informal channels

9. Risk Management & Mitigation

I systematically identify and mitigate risks through comprehensive planning, stakeholder alignment, and fallback strategies.

Example: For the Digital Fulfillment Service, I managed complex stakeholder relationships across 75+ stakeholders and 10 internal/external teams, ensuring mission-critical system delivery. This risk management approach was documented in my team process establishment and career growth planning.

My Process:

• Identify potential risks early in the planning phase
• Create mitigation strategies for each identified risk
• Establish clear communication channels with all stakeholders
• Build fallback plans for critical dependencies
• Monitor and adjust risk management strategies throughout execution

10. Systematic Learning & Adaptation

Every project is a learning opportunity. I build systematic processes to capture insights and apply them to future challenges.

Example: My WLBR (Weblab Bar Raiser) training taught me systematic approaches to experimentation that I then applied across 50+ experiment ideas in 7 hackathon sessions, helping teams increase the likelihood of leadership adoption. This learning process was documented in my WLBR training notes and innovation process habits.

My Process:

• Document decisions and their outcomes
• Identify patterns across different projects
• Create reusable frameworks and templates
• Share learnings with the broader team
• Continuously refine approaches based on results

Navigating Ambiguity: My Decision Framework

When facing unclear situations, I use a structured approach to reduce uncertainty and make informed decisions:

Step 1: Problem Definition

• What exactly are we trying to solve?
• What does success look like?
• What are the constraints and requirements?

Step 2: Information Gathering

• What do we know? What don't we know?
• Who has relevant information or experience?
• What assumptions are we making?

Step 3: Option Generation

• What are all possible approaches?
• What are the tradeoffs for each option?
• What are the risks and mitigation strategies?

Step 4: Decision Making

• Which option best balances all factors?
• How will we measure success?
• What's our fallback plan?

Step 5: Implementation & Learning

• How will we execute the chosen approach?
• How will we know if it's working?
• What will we learn for next time?

Creating Impact Through Collaboration

My approach to impact creation centers on enabling others to succeed. I focus on building systems, processes, and capabilities that multiply effectiveness across teams.

Key Principles:

• Build for Scale: Design solutions that work beyond the immediate problem
• Enable Others: Create frameworks others can use and adapt
• Measure Impact: Establish clear metrics and feedback loops
• Share Knowledge: Document and teach approaches for broader adoption

Examples of Impact Multiplication:

• 75+ Stakeholder Alignment: Digital Fulfillment Service coordination across multiple teams (documented in team process establishment notes)
• 25+ Productivity Prompts: GenAI tools adoption across Amazon (grounded in innovation process habits)
• 50+ Experiment Ideas: Team ideation sessions across 7 hackathon events (documented in WLBR training and innovation process notes)
• WLBR Standards: Experimentation frameworks adopted organization-wide (based on working backwards habits and team development processes)

Continuous Improvement Through Reflection

I maintain systematic processes for learning and improvement:

Project Retrospectives

• What worked well and why?
• What could have been done differently?
• What patterns can be applied to future projects?

Knowledge Documentation

• Capture decision rationale and outcomes
• Create reusable frameworks and templates
• Share learnings with broader teams

Skill Development

• Identify gaps through project challenges
• Seek feedback from stakeholders and peers
• Practice new approaches in safe environments

Key Insights for Others

Based on my experience across 16+ major projects, here are the most important lessons I've learned:

1. Work Backwards from Impact: Start with the customer problem and desired outcome, then design the technical solution to achieve that impact

2. Let Data Drive Decisions: Use metrics and evidence to guide all technical and business decisions, not just intuition

3. Build for Scale: Design solutions that work beyond the immediate problem and can be adopted by others

4. Invest in People: Technical solutions are only as good as the team's ability to implement and maintain them

5. Manage Risk Systematically: Identify and mitigate risks early, with clear fallback plans for critical dependencies

6. Foster Innovation Systematically: Create structured processes for ideation, experimentation, and knowledge sharing

7. Document Everything: Create frameworks and templates that can be reused and adapted by others

8. Learn Continuously: Build processes for capturing and applying learnings across projects

9. Focus on Impact: Measure success by the value created for stakeholders, not just technical achievements

10. Enable Others: Build systems and processes that multiply effectiveness across teams

This comprehensive approach has enabled me to deliver consistent impact across diverse domains—from healthcare lead generation to financial platform architecture to e-commerce experimentation frameworks. The key is applying systematic thinking while remaining adaptable to the unique challenges of each situation, always working backwards from customer impact and using data to drive decisions.

---

To Encorporate

Production Deployment Patterns

1. Crawl-Walk-Run Methodology

Implementation Strategy:

• Crawl: Internal applications with controlled user base
• Walk: Limited external user testing
• Run: Full production deployment with multi-agent collaboration

Benefits:

• Risk mitigation
• Gradual capability building
• User feedback incorporation
• Performance validation

🤖 AI Metadata (Click to expand)

# AI METADATA - DO NOT REMOVE OR MODIFY
# AI_UPDATE_INSTRUCTIONS:
# This blog post has a corresponding evaluation rubric that should be referenced for enhancement suggestions.
# When editing this post, AI should read the rubric and provide specific improvement suggestions.
#
# 1. SCAN_SOURCES: Read the evaluation rubric at /docs/10-prompts/evals/specific-posts/evaluating-my-approach.md
# 2. EVALUATE_CONTENT: Check current blog post content against rubric criteria
# 3. IDENTIFY_GAPS: Find areas where criteria are not met or could be improved
# 4. SUGGEST_ENHANCEMENTS: Provide specific suggestions for improvement based on rubric criteria
# 5. MAINTAIN_FOCUS: Keep suggestions focused on problem-solving methodology demonstration
# 6. PRESERVE_STRUCTURE: Maintain blog post structure while suggesting improvements
#
# EVALUATION_RUBRIC:
# - File: /docs/10-prompts/evals/specific-posts/evaluating-my-approach.md
# - Focus: Problem-solving methodology demonstration
# - Criteria: 12 specific evaluation points across 3 categories
# - Quality Threshold: 8+ criteria for publish-ready (80%+)
#
# RUBRIC_READING_INSTRUCTIONS:
# 1. Read the evaluation rubric completely
# 2. Understand the specific criteria for this blog post
# 3. Check each criterion against current content
# 4. Identify which criteria are met and which need improvement
# 5. Provide specific suggestions for meeting unmet criteria
#
# ENHANCEMENT_SUGGESTIONS:
# - Problem-Solving Demonstration: Clear methodology, specific examples, process clarity
# - Ambiguity Navigation: Unclear situations, decision framework, information gathering
# - Impact Creation: Value delivery, measurable results, stakeholder benefit
# - Methodology Clarity: Systematic process, step-by-step, decision points, adaptation
# - Problem-Solving Examples: Real scenarios, context setting, process application, outcome demonstration
# - Personal Insight: Unique perspective, learning reflection, continuous improvement, teaching value
#
# SUGGESTION_FORMAT:
# - Be specific about what content to add or improve
# - Reference the exact rubric criteria being addressed
# - Provide concrete examples of how to meet the criteria
# - Suggest specific sections or areas to enhance
# - Maintain the blog post's authentic voice and personal perspective
#
# UPDATE_TRIGGERS:
# - Blog post content changes
# - New content added to the blog post
# - Existing content modified or removed
# - Blog post structure changes
# - Focus on problem-solving methodology demonstration
#
# FORMATTING_RULES:
# - Maintain consistent blog post structure
# - Keep personal voice and authentic perspective
# - Focus on practical, actionable problem-solving approach
# - Include specific examples and concrete outcomes
# - Demonstrate systematic thinking and decision-making
#
# UPDATE_FREQUENCY: Every time the blog post is modified or this metadata is accessed
#
# CONTENT_GROUNDING_REQUIREMENTS:
# - All examples and methodologies must be grounded in real professional contributions
# - Reference specific projects from resume and work documentation
# - Use actual metrics, outcomes, and stakeholder interactions from real projects
# - Ground approach descriptions in concrete examples from timeline and NotePlan directories
# - Ensure all problem-solving examples are based on actual project experiences
#
# SOURCE_DIRECTORIES:
# - Resume: /Users/omareid/Desktop/Career/2025-XX-XX Job Applications/hubspot/oeid-resume.md
# - Amazon Notes: /Users/omareid/Library/Containers/co.noteplan.NotePlan3/Data/Library/Application Support/co.noteplan.NotePlan3/Notes/🏢 Amazon
# - F2-SCX Notes: /Users/omareid/Library/Containers/co.noteplan.NotePlan3/Data/Library/Application Support/co.noteplan.NotePlan3/Notes/@Archive/F2-SCX
# - CognitiveScale Notes: /Users/omareid/Dropbox/Apps/iA Writer c12e
# - Project Timeline: /Users/omareid/Workspace/git/projects/omars-lab.github.io/bytesofpurpose-blog/blog/2025-09-27-my-contributions.md
#
# APPROACH_DOCUMENTATION_SOURCES:
# - WLBR Training: Working Backwards habits and experimentation standards
# - Team Processes: Establishing team processes and innovation frameworks
# - Mentorship: Onboarding buddy guidance and technical development
# - Interviewing: Technical hiring and bar raising processes
# - Career Growth: Promotion criteria and leadership development
# - Innovation: Hackathon coordination and ideation processes
#
# METHODOLOGY_GROUNDING:
# - Problem-solving approach grounded in 16+ major projects across 4 companies
# - Decision-making framework based on real technical tradeoffs and stakeholder alignment
# - Learning processes derived from systematic documentation and reflection
# - Impact creation methods proven across healthcare, financial services, e-commerce, and enterprise domains
# - Collaboration techniques validated through 75+ stakeholder relationships
#
# COMPREHENSIVE_APPROACH_FRAMEWORK:
# - 10 Core Problem-Solving Elements: Information Gathering, Decision-Making, Problem Decomposition, 
#   Stakeholder Alignment, Working Backwards, Metrics-Driven Decisions, Innovation Leadership, 
#   Technical Leadership, Risk Management, Systematic Learning
# - Each element grounded in specific project examples with links to timeline sections
# - All examples reference actual NotePlan files and work documentation
# - Framework demonstrates systematic thinking across diverse domains and complex challenges
#
# ENHANCED_METHODOLOGY_ELEMENTS:
# - Working Backwards: Customer impact → technical solution design (Driver Feedback AI example)
# - Metrics-Driven Decisions: Data-backed choices with measurable outcomes (F2-SCX framework)
# - Innovation Leadership: Structured ideation and hackathon coordination (50+ experiment ideas)
# - Technical Leadership: Mentorship and knowledge sharing (WLBR standards adoption)
# - Risk Management: Stakeholder alignment and fallback strategies (Digital Fulfillment Service)
# - Systematic Learning: Cross-project pattern recognition and framework creation
#
# PROJECT_SPECIFIC_GROUNDING:
# - SDS Launch: WLBR training and team process establishment habits
# - ML Pipeline Optimization: CognitiveScale design documents and architecture planning
# - F2-SCX Framework: F2-SCX plans and leading metrics workstream documentation
# - Organization-Wide Success: Career growth planning and promotion pursuit habits
# - Driver Feedback AI: Working backwards habits and WLBR training
# - Digital Fulfillment: Team process establishment and career growth planning
# - Team Ideation: Innovation process habits and team development notes
# - WLBR Standards: WLBR training notes and working backwards habits
#
# TIMELINE_INTEGRATION:
# - All approach examples link to specific project sections in contributions timeline
# - Each methodology element references grounded NotePlan files
# - Cross-references between approach methodology and detailed project implementations
# - Creates cohesive narrative between problem-solving approach and actual project outcomes
#
# AUTHENTICITY_REQUIREMENTS:
# - All examples must be grounded in real professional contributions
# - Methodology descriptions based on actual project experiences
# - Metrics and outcomes from documented project results
# - Stakeholder interactions from real collaboration experiences
# - Learning processes from systematic documentation and reflection
#
# COMPREHENSIVE_INSIGHTS:
# - 10 Key Principles: Work Backwards, Data-Driven Decisions, Build for Scale, Invest in People,
#   Manage Risk Systematically, Foster Innovation, Document Everything, Learn Continuously,
#   Focus on Impact, Enable Others
# - Each principle derived from real project experiences and systematic methodology
# - Demonstrates evolution of approach across different companies and domains
# - Shows consistent application of systematic thinking to complex challenges
#
# CRITICAL_AI_AGENT_GUIDANCE:
# - ALWAYS ground all examples in specific project contributions from timeline
# - ALWAYS reference actual NotePlan files and work documentation
# - ALWAYS include specific metrics, outcomes, and stakeholder interactions
# - ALWAYS maintain links to detailed project sections in contributions timeline
# - ALWAYS use STAR format (Situation, Task, Action, Result) for examples
# - ALWAYS demonstrate systematic thinking and decision-making processes
# - ALWAYS show how approach adapts to different domains and challenges
# - ALWAYS include both technical and business impact in examples
#
# CONTENT_ENHANCEMENT_PRIORITIES:
# - Add more specific technical tradeoff analysis with concrete metrics
# - Include more examples of cross-team coordination and stakeholder management
# - Demonstrate innovation leadership through structured ideation processes
# - Show risk management through specific stakeholder mapping and dependency management
# - Include more metrics-driven decision making with specific data examples
# - Add examples of systematic learning and knowledge sharing across projects
#
# QUALITY_ASSURANCE_CHECKLIST:
# - Verify all examples link to specific project sections in contributions timeline
# - Ensure all methodology descriptions are grounded in actual work documentation
# - Confirm all metrics and outcomes are from documented project results
# - Check that all stakeholder interactions are from real collaboration experiences
# - Validate that all learning processes are from systematic documentation
# - Ensure approach demonstrates systematic thinking across diverse domains
#
# COMMON_PITFALLS_TO_AVOID:
# - Don't create generic problem-solving advice without specific examples
# - Don't use fictional metrics or outcomes
# - Don't break links to contributions timeline sections
# - Don't create examples without grounding in actual project work
# - Don't skip the systematic methodology demonstration
# - Don't assume stakeholder interactions without documentation